
Adrian Volenik
Mon, May 12, 2025, 6:45 AM 4 min read
In This Article:
Benzinga and Yahoo Finance LLC may earn commission or revenue on some items through the links below.
A Reddit user shared a homebuying nightmare that sparked a good deal of outrage in the r/RealEstate community.
In the post, the buyer explained that their seller suddenly demanded an extra $7,000, citing an escalation clause, despite both parties having already signed a purchase agreement. “My closing is in just three days, and today my realtor told me that the seller is suddenly increasing our purchase price by $7,000,” the post said.
Don't Miss:
-
Inspired by Uber and Airbnb – Deloitte's fastest-growing software company is transforming 7 billion smartphones into income-generating assets – with $1,000 you can invest at just $0.30/share!
-
Maker of the $60,000 foldable home has 3 factory buildings, 600+ houses built, and big plans to solve housing — you can become an investor for $0.80 per share today.
The buyer said they initially offered $650,000 for the property, which the seller rejected in favor of a higher offer. When that deal fell through, the seller came back to the original buyer, agreeing to the $650,000 price.
However, as the homebuyer wrote, “Now, just days before closing, the seller claims the price should be $657,000 because of our escalation clause, saying they have proof another buyer offered around that amount.”
According to the buyer, the escalation clause only applied before their offer was accepted, and the signed purchase agreement clearly stated the price as $650,000. "Told my realtor that the Purchase Agreement stated $650,000 and the escalation clause applies only before acceptance and is no longer in effect," the buyer wrote in an update.
However, when their realtor responded it added to the buyer's frustration, as they felt their representative should be firmly defending the agreed-upon price.
Trending: Arrived Home's Private Credit Fund’s has historically paid an annualized dividend yield of 8.1%*, which provides access to a pool of short-term loans backed by residential real estate with just a $100 minimum.
The post triggered a wave of sharp criticism, with many commenters questioning the competence of the buyer's realtor. One user said, "You have a signed contract. Full stop. That's the price." Another added, "Your realtor is an idiot. They signed the contract, any other offers that weren't previously presented are now irrelevant. Doesn't matter when it was dated for."
Several users pointed out that a signed purchase agreement typically supersedes any prior offers or escalation clauses. "The purchase agreement always trumps any offers," one commenter wrote. "If you have a signed agreement at $650,000, that is the cost of the house."